<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Multi-Touch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trentwalton.com/2010/02/02/multi-touch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trentwalton.com/2010/02/02/multi-touch/</link>
	<description>Trent Walton&#039;s Web Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:51:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Diseris</title>
		<link>http://trentwalton.com/2010/02/02/multi-touch/#comment-7208</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Diseris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 01:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trentwalton.com/?p=2572#comment-7208</guid>
		<description>@ DAVID ARNOLD &quot; I can picture this working better if my screens were built flat into my desk like the old packman tables.&quot;

Can you imagine though how sore our necks would get by constantly looking down?

This is raising an ergonomic issue, which I can appreciate as I already experience pain from hours spent working on a computer. I see a distinct separation between workstation based systems, and consumer multi-touch devices which I don&#039;t see merging into one unified approach.  I don&#039;t see a pointer device disappearing completely (from workstation based systems at least) - I perhaps see screens acting as a tablet with a pen becoming  more of a standard like a Wacom Cintiq-21ux - http://www.wacom.com/cintiq/cintiq-21ux.php.

Our work-based system could end up like in the movie `Minority Report&#039;, but that raises an issue of possible RSI injury extending to the arms and shoulders and not just the mouse hand (which I now experience).

Although I now work as an interactive art director, this left-field point of view or focus comes from my background in Industrial Design study and an early interest in ergonomics, which explains my diversion from the main topic. I though it would be interesting to discuss the factor of human interaction and ergonomics with devices of the future.

What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ DAVID ARNOLD ” I can picture this working better if my screens were built flat into my desk like the old packman tables.”</p>
<p>Can you imagine though how sore our necks would get by constantly looking down?</p>
<p>This is raising an ergonomic issue, which I can appreciate as I already experience pain from hours spent working on a computer. I see a distinct separation between workstation based systems, and consumer multi-touch devices which I don’t see merging into one unified approach.  I don’t see a pointer device disappearing completely (from workstation based systems at least) - I perhaps see screens acting as a tablet with a pen becoming  more of a standard like a Wacom Cintiq-21ux - <a href="http://www.wacom.com/cintiq/cintiq-21ux.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.wacom.com/cintiq/cintiq-21ux.php</a>.</p>
<p>Our work-based system could end up like in the movie ‘Minority Report’, but that raises an issue of possible RSI injury extending to the arms and shoulders and not just the mouse hand (which I now experience).</p>
<p>Although I now work as an interactive art director, this left-field point of view or focus comes from my background in Industrial Design study and an early interest in ergonomics, which explains my diversion from the main topic. I though it would be interesting to discuss the factor of human interaction and ergonomics with devices of the future.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marylynn Lablue</title>
		<link>http://trentwalton.com/2010/02/02/multi-touch/#comment-4454</link>
		<dc:creator>Marylynn Lablue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trentwalton.com/?p=2572#comment-4454</guid>
		<description>the economy and also the lack of firms willing to invest in their Ä±nternet sites and upgrades. Web sites are Crucial to a business&#039;s success so there will always be a will want for wonderful internet websites, currently most businesses are channeling their dollars elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the economy and also the lack of firms willing to invest in their Ä±nternet sites and upgrades. Web sites are Crucial to a business’s success so there will always be a will want for wonderful internet websites, currently most businesses are channeling their dollars elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent</title>
		<link>http://trentwalton.com/2010/02/02/multi-touch/#comment-2181</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trentwalton.com/?p=2572#comment-2181</guid>
		<description>Great link, Allen...  I could definitely see specialists appreciating these.  John Gruber has a similar point, comparing &lt;a href=&quot;http://daringfireball.net/2010/01/various_ipad_thoughts&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;multi-touch to cars with automatic transmissions&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great link, Allen...  I could definitely see specialists appreciating these.  John Gruber has a similar point, comparing <a href="http://daringfireball.net/2010/01/various_ipad_thoughts" rel="nofollow">multi-touch to cars with automatic transmissions</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen Tan</title>
		<link>http://trentwalton.com/2010/02/02/multi-touch/#comment-2162</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Tan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 07:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trentwalton.com/?p=2572#comment-2162</guid>
		<description>Ken, you&#039;ve just touched on a pet love of mine. =) Have you heard about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I2rDHUUkd5Y&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SLAP widgets&lt;/a&gt;?  The idea of having individual tools, each with a specialization - pencils for sketching, keyboards for typing, etc, as physical, tangible objects that can be put away is very appealing to me. I suspect, though, that even if they exist in the future, these will be confined to &quot;specialists&quot;, the way Wacom tablets are for computer illustrators today. Everyday people will prefer an experience without having to drag along a cumbersome set of tools.

And then there&#039;s the possibility of digitizing and abstracting these tools. Steve Jobs argues that a blank surface allows for a far richer, and more adaptable set of interfaces, and I have to agree. (Word suggestions on a keyboard is a good example.) It&#039;s a tradeoff between tangibility and flexibility (and convenience), I think, and perhaps digital versions of rulers and keyboards will prove to be worth the tradeoff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken, you’ve just touched on a pet love of mine. =) Have you heard about <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I2rDHUUkd5Y" rel="nofollow">SLAP widgets</a>?  The idea of having individual tools, each with a specialization - pencils for sketching, keyboards for typing, etc, as physical, tangible objects that can be put away is very appealing to me. I suspect, though, that even if they exist in the future, these will be confined to “specialists”, the way Wacom tablets are for computer illustrators today. Everyday people will prefer an experience without having to drag along a cumbersome set of tools.</p>
<p>And then there’s the possibility of digitizing and abstracting these tools. Steve Jobs argues that a blank surface allows for a far richer, and more adaptable set of interfaces, and I have to agree. (Word suggestions on a keyboard is a good example.) It’s a tradeoff between tangibility and flexibility (and convenience), I think, and perhaps digital versions of rulers and keyboards will prove to be worth the tradeoff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent</title>
		<link>http://trentwalton.com/2010/02/02/multi-touch/#comment-2159</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trentwalton.com/?p=2572#comment-2159</guid>
		<description>Ken, I hadn&#039;t thought about incorporating / creating tools like pencils or rulers before.  Stuff like that alongside a drafting desk posture could really make the virtual work we do feel more natural and tangible.  Cool stuff &amp; thanks for commenting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken, I hadn’t thought about incorporating / creating tools like pencils or rulers before.  Stuff like that alongside a drafting desk posture could really make the virtual work we do feel more natural and tangible.  Cool stuff &amp; thanks for commenting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken</title>
		<link>http://trentwalton.com/2010/02/02/multi-touch/#comment-2083</link>
		<dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trentwalton.com/?p=2572#comment-2083</guid>
		<description>i agree with the notion that we&#039;re moving towards a more human friendly and casual relationship with computers. 

but given the &quot;innacuracy&quot; of our hands doesn&#039;t mean things should be made bigger to accomodate them. rather we have a long history of creating our own tools to be more precised. i.e. pencils, rulers, etc. these types of customary devices should be incorporated but hands should not be excluded.

i agree with allen tan about the future being large screens i too posted about emerging physical interfaces a while back &lt;a href=&quot;http://kenfrederick.blogspot.com/2009/05/hands-on.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://kenfrederick.blogspot.com/2009/08/hands-on-update.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. it seems obvious to me that in future workspaces it will resemble the drafting rooms of days past (i.e. &lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/d4c2gr&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;microsoft sustainability&lt;/a&gt; )

these are exactly the types of discussions that need to be had, and creators of not only web content need to anticipate retihinking how users interact, but creative software companies, adobe, autodesk, etc. need to as well.

thanks.
Ken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with the notion that we’re moving towards a more human friendly and casual relationship with computers. </p>
<p>but given the “innacuracy” of our hands doesn’t mean things should be made bigger to accomodate them. rather we have a long history of creating our own tools to be more precised. i.e. pencils, rulers, etc. these types of customary devices should be incorporated but hands should not be excluded.</p>
<p>i agree with allen tan about the future being large screens i too posted about emerging physical interfaces a while back <a href="http://kenfrederick.blogspot.com/2009/05/hands-on.html" rel="nofollow">here</a> and <a href="http://kenfrederick.blogspot.com/2009/08/hands-on-update.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>. it seems obvious to me that in future workspaces it will resemble the drafting rooms of days past (i.e. <a href="http://tinyurl.com/d4c2gr" rel="nofollow">microsoft sustainability</a> )</p>
<p>these are exactly the types of discussions that need to be had, and creators of not only web content need to anticipate retihinking how users interact, but creative software companies, adobe, autodesk, etc. need to as well.</p>
<p>thanks.<br />
Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arron Davies</title>
		<link>http://trentwalton.com/2010/02/02/multi-touch/#comment-2052</link>
		<dc:creator>Arron Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 17:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trentwalton.com/?p=2572#comment-2052</guid>
		<description>Interesting stuff I always enjoy your posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting stuff I always enjoy your posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent</title>
		<link>http://trentwalton.com/2010/02/02/multi-touch/#comment-2045</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trentwalton.com/?p=2572#comment-2045</guid>
		<description>I think that&#039;d work well, though there is definitely no wrong place to comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that’d work well, though there is definitely no wrong place to comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis Neilson</title>
		<link>http://trentwalton.com/2010/02/02/multi-touch/#comment-2041</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis Neilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 22:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trentwalton.com/?p=2572#comment-2041</guid>
		<description>I am not suggesting either way, just bringing up the question. Wondering for my own information, more accurately. As a visitor, the most logical way for me to respond to your response, is to click the reply link under my own comment. Is that your intention? What after that? Can you reply to your own reply?
I really like this medhod you have here, I am  quite jealous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not suggesting either way, just bringing up the question. Wondering for my own information, more accurately. As a visitor, the most logical way for me to respond to your response, is to click the reply link under my own comment. Is that your intention? What after that? Can you reply to your own reply?<br />
I really like this medhod you have here, I am  quite jealous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent</title>
		<link>http://trentwalton.com/2010/02/02/multi-touch/#comment-2040</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trentwalton.com/?p=2572#comment-2040</guid>
		<description>Good question- I&#039;m not sure.  My initial thought was to make it easy to track replies vertically. I wouldn&#039;t want to send a final word vibe out.  I wonder if being able to self-reply or start a new comment is sufficient.  I&#039;m always open to ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question- I’m not sure.  My initial thought was to make it easy to track replies vertically. I wouldn’t want to send a final word vibe out.  I wonder if being able to self-reply or start a new comment is sufficient.  I’m always open to ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.002 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 453/454 objects using disk: basic

Served from: trentwalton.com @ 2012-02-03 22:01:52 -->
